Imagine How to Ruin an Organization

Imagine pouring all your energy and effort into your job. You leave exhausted everyday, still having work you take with you to finish at home. And it's agreed by superiors and stakeholders alike that you do an "amazing" job.

Now imagine never getting a raise for that performance. Ever. The system doesn't allow for it. Instead, you're required to take some of your effort and energy away from your primary job to do extra work to even be considered for a raise. Year after year. If you accumulate evidence as to the amount of extra work you perform, a group decides, then, exactly how much, if any, you should get for the extra work you do. All the while, health care costs eat up more of your wages every year, and annual inflation further erodes your salary.

Would you imagine that sounds like a profession you'd want to be in? Actually, could you even imagine a job that would do that to its employees?

Doing an "amazing" job is no longer enough (photo from teach.com)

That's exactly the scenario playing out in some of our state's school districts since Scott Walker stripped education funding, and further stripped the possibility of districts working as a team with their employees and their representative unions, when he and the Wisconsin GOP legislature enacted Act 10 in 2011.

And, quite frankly, it's going to catch up with Wisconsin's education system.

Young teachers will burn out more quickly, veteran teachers (like me) will continue to work with the insult and indignation knowing the "amazing" job they do will never bring any more money into their households.

To me, that doesn't seem like a terrifically sustainable model for success.

Some readers here, I'm sure, will say to veteran teachers in this situation, "Don't let the door hit you on the way out." But we still love teaching. And we're still good at it. We understand the system has changed from the equitable system in which we started our teaching, but the loss of that experience, and continuity, and the comfort of someone doing an "amazing" job, is incalculable.

And the next generation of dynamic teachers won't have the energy or the will, I'm guessing, to continue to fill those tremendous voids. I see it already in the stress levels of my seriously amazing colleagues.

The state is already providing alternative paths into teaching, providing people without the education or studied pedagogy the opportunity to be entrusted with educating our youth.

I mean, as much as some people might think it is, it isn't babysitting.

And, then what?

Let's just say, it doesn't seem like a great thing to imagine.

Trump, Vile and Evil?

I am sitting here waiting to hear the official US take of the bombs sent to people Trump has basically called enemies.

What will Trump say about the vile and evil terroristic efforts against former presidents and American citizens and news operations?

So far, all he had said officially was a retweet of his VP's, adding his own very heart-felt and inspiring message: I agree wholeheartedly.

Image from CNN

Wait--nothing yet...

Oh, here's MELANIA, instead. She praises her husband. She talks about her "Be Best" program (which ironically supposedly calls out bullies--unless she's married to them).

Then comes her husband.

He makes a joke about his wife that English is just one of her many languages.

He does not mention ANY of the persons targeted--including former presidents, for goodness sake. He does NOT take any responsibility for the violence he's condoned before in his comments or at his rallies. . He does not mention his proclamations that the media (including one of the targets, CNN) are enemies of the people.  He DOES NOT mention the word terrorism (that I heard).

Instead he says political violence has no place in the US. He says he is (and this is a DIRECT quote), that he is "angry, upset, unhappy" at the events that transpired and it will be investigated.

Um, then he's done. About three minutes of comfort and direction for a confused and terrorized nation.

Then it's on to opioids.

Trump does NOT say to his followers, "DON'T DO THIS!" He does NOT say that his media/enemies of the people comments are hyperbole. He does NOT say it abhors him.

Instead, it's just another dog whistle, more red meat for his crazed followers (many of whom already claim Dems did it to make the GOP look bad--like the immigrant caravan, or the Puerto Rico hurricane death tolls).

It's another call to those vile and evil Charlottesville faithful--the ones that marched to promote white supremacy (good people on both sides).

It's a call to the vile and  evil racism inherent in Trump's comments decrying African-Americans peacefully protesting in the NFL.

It's Trump's self-proclamation that he's a "nationalist," when he seems to know, but then thoroughly denies he's aware of that word's vile and evil connotations (despite EVERYONE in the country knowing those vile and evil connotations).

That's because he's a vile and evil man.

I mean, I'd really like to know, what other explanation is there?


NOTE: From the earlier post, I removed the descriptor of Trump's followers as "vile and evil." That would be unfair to many. I merely used it to highlight those that really are crazed (such as those that subscribe to the divisiveness of certain internet sites and beliefs).

Enemy of the People

Trump calls the media the enemy of the people.
Amazingly--and terrifyingly so--his minions believe him.

They believe his lies about "fake news," and they chuckle at his "jokes" about GOPers body-slamming reporters, or nod in affirmation about his dismissiveness with members of the press during a press conference (i.e., calling on "Mr. Kurd"). They silently cheer when certain news outlets are denied access to Presidential forums, they laugh when he mocks a journalist with disabilities, they jeer--actually jeer--at the journalists present when Trump spews his vile lies about the media at his rallies.
And now Trump says the explanation of the brutal murder of a journalist, likely at the hand of Saudi government forces, is credible-credible--despite logic, decency, and even now-ardent-Trump-backer Lindsay Graham saying it's not.
The country should be aghast (and many of us are).
The media (and the free speech that protects even the misguided-or-worse websites that also peddle Trump's disgusting trash) are something we need in this country. They allow us to gain access to facts instead of just taking someone's word for it (such as, "I am not a crook" or "No collusion!!"), they allow us to make informed decisions, and they are vital to keep those in power accountable.
But Trump still peddles his divisiveness and hatred.
And so sadly, for many, it's working.
But is it the media that's the enemy of the people?
Or is it Trump?

Kavanaugh--who he is

Kavanaugh is a danger to this country. His confirmation is a travesty.

Yes, Kavanaugh's views and decisions are ultra-conservative. They will play a major role in changing the course of our country for decades to come.

But that's not the reason he should have been denied.

It's not what he believes that should disqualify him, but rather who he is.

When first nominated, Kavanaugh downplayed his leanings and highlighted his "collegiality with left-leaning judges" (WaPo, 7/10/18).

He repeatedly espouses his supposed belief that the Supreme Court should be non-partisan ("The Supreme Court must never be viewed as a partisan institution," Kavanaugh hearing transcript).  And he's right, cases should be decided based on the fluidity and interpretation of Constitutional law. Yet during his recent hearing, Kavanaugh's true belief reared its partisan head when he, actually, ranted that the assault allegations against him were a political hit, that included "revenge on behalf of the Clintons and millions of dollars in money from outside left-wing opposition groups."

And that's who he is. Someone who can't be trusted.

And his numerous misleading statements regarding his drinking and activities ("boofing" is flatulence, there's no way he ever could have forgotten anything while drunk, in Maryland the drinking age was 18 so seniors could drink--despite the FACT he was only 17 when Maryland changed the age to 21), also show who he is.

A quote from the Bible of Kavanaugh's religion (Luke 16:10) says, "he who is false in small things, is false in great."

Yes, that's who he is.

And the defensiveness and outright belligerence towards those asking him questions--asking Senators what they drank or, unbelievably, if they had ever blacked out from drinking--has nothing to do with what he believes.

It shows who he is.

Terrifyingly so.

And now who he is is someone soon to sit on the highest court in the land, a court that should light the way of truth and fairness for our citizenry.

Soon to include Brett Kavanaugh.

And who he is should scare everyone.